| 2010-03-29 17:55:10 • Riku Kuokka (tornitus) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4729 |
| I'm interested in hearing why should we be happy with a draw? Really weird in my opinion.
May i read between the lines that you are meaning "you should be happy with this draw, because our team is so much better anyway."? I really disagree, we should not be happy with a draw, because we won the game 17-15.. -tornitus | |
| 2010-03-29 17:49:22 • Mateusz Miśkiewicz (krmorph) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4728 |
| Sorry Guys, we repeate game because, in first game i had problem with comp and i lost, then i lost for miss click, so apsolutlly was 0-2. But in this day I had unluck with copm. Then i ask Zathras "Can we repeate first game?" Then we repeate. You Team Mollo should be happy this draw. Thats all from my side | |
| 2010-03-29 13:34:22 • Riku Kuokka (tornitus) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4727 |
| The third game was played _just in case_ because players werent sure what the rules say. And as you can see, they say "5.7.A player gains 1 game point for each won game." So this should be a clear case.
There is no fairplay-rule that forces player to give his opponent a new chance. Zathras wasnt sure about this, and asked if he must play. No one gave him the answer so he decided to play this 3rd game just in case. I think rules are rules, and 2 games matter, the third game was non-EL-game. kind regards, tornitus | |
| 2010-03-29 12:17:11 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4725 |
| So what is the rule that should have been understood here? I don't see a rule saying that if two players play third game, it is automatically considered as a rematch of one of the previous games. Such declaration would be a disaster full of contradictions on internet based tournaments in general, because there could be reasons like accidents, continuing playing just for fun, unclear rematches done by not knowing or understanding rules, non-understandable rules,..
I think it is very natural to not be 100% sure if this rule covers disconnection being a loss: 5.7.A player gains 1 game point for each won game. Actually I think draw would be better for our team because with a win we will be paired with an opponent we have no chance to beat on next round :). But I hope this issue here brings also some clarity if the rules are revised one day. | |
| 2010-03-29 11:48:45 • Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4723 |
| Well, if he had 5:xx then it was also a disadvantage for the opponent to replay the same position. If the position would be his advantage, then those 4+ extra minutes can be well used for attack. But with accepting an agreement, and accepting exactly the same moves to be played, the player is accepting this disadvantage voluntarily. 5 minutes break between games can be also misused for analysis. For future the best would be either to not replay at all or to replay using a completely new game, but both captains should agree about this first in advance, which seems was not a case here.
To replay "because I don't know the rule" is strange, because every team confirmed the members read and understand the rules :) OK, now waiting for response from KR but please no insultations or bad behaviour, just facts. | |
| 2010-03-29 11:12:53 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4722 |
| Wait a second. I think it's the KR who should say why the third game should be counted and not us saying why it is not. IMHO it should be always like that in case there is no common understanding how third game affects the score. So let's see their story first. | |
| 2010-03-29 10:58:35 • Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4721 |
| My question is: was the third game really played "just in case" or both players made a gentleman agreement that because the first game was interrupted by network problem they don't count it and replay it again. I wonder, why would krmorph want to replay the first game otherwise? | |
| 2010-03-29 10:36:10 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4720 |
| Third game was played, because zathras wasn't sure about the rules and he wanted to play it just in case, so that the issue could be sorted out later. However, he asked in game room during games against krmorph if he can get +1 from first game.
As a side note, krmorph had 5:xx left on clock when disconnection happened. | |
| 2010-03-29 10:06:18 • Tomo Dernovšek (jezek_si) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4717 |
| Committe asks both captains to explain why Zathras and Krmorph played the 3rd game and the reasons why the 3rd game is (not) valid. | |
| 2010-03-28 22:02:38 • Michał Wileczek (krvilumisiek) | |
(up to 40 characters, HTML tags are not | # 4713 |
| haha, be seriuos
im sure that comitet will see it and tell who have right losers | |
| 2010-03-28 17:29:04 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo 15:17 | # 4711 |
| Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo 15 : 17
Round: 1 krcrosslet - fire2fire 1 : 1 krmorph - tornitus 1 : 1 krvilumisiek - zathras 1 : 1 krjabik - pellikka 1 : 1 Round: 2 krmorph - fire2fire 1 : 1 krjabik - tornitus 0 : 2 krcrosslet - zathras 2 : 0 krvilumisiek - pellikka 0 : 2 Round: 3 krjabik - fire2fire 2 : 0 krvilumisiek - tornitus 1 : 1 krmorph - zathras 0 : 2 krcrosslet - pellikka 1 : 1 Round: 4 krvilumisiek - fire2fire 1 : 1 krcrosslet - tornitus 0 : 2 krjabik - zathras 2 : 0 krmorph - pellikka 1 : 1 Maybe Klub Rzeszow has a different opinion about the outcome of the krmorph - zathras games. But you can see the result played with opposite colors on PlayOK statistics section. -marko | |
| 2010-03-06 09:37:26 • Peter Jonsson (peterjo) | |
luffarna - attack team | # 4627 |
| Attack team did not show up on February 25.
Peter Jonsson, captain Luffarna | |
| 2010-01-31 17:47:05 • Ádám Varga (songokukek) | |
Kulonleges Erook- Attack team | # 4547 |
| Kulonleges Erook vs Attack team : +-
Attack team didn't appear so we won by walk over. | |
| 2010-01-24 16:25 • József Barabás (erkisherceg) | |
Easy Riders vs Attack team | # 4511 |
| Easy Riders vs Attack team : +-
Attack team didn't appear so we won by walk over. | |
| 2009-12-08 22:40:29 • Michał Żukowski (zukolepl) | |
cRUSaders 27 - 5 Attack Team | # 4329 |
| cRUSaders 27 - 5 Attack Team
crgrady - atparys 1:1 crnikolay - atsnieznyy 2:0 crspartak - atmaniac 1:1 crvostok - wssuczkins 2:0 6:2 crgrady - wssuczkins 1:1 crnikolay - atparys 2:0 crspartak - atsnieznyy 2:0 crvostok - atmaniac 2:0 7:1 ( 13:3 ) crgrady - atmaniac 2:0 crnikolay - wssuczkins 0:1 ( and +:- ) crbaumanec - atparys 2:0 crvostok - atsnieznyy 2:0 7:1 ( 20:4 ) crgrady - atsnieznyy 1:1 crnikolay - atmaniac 2:0 crbaumanec - wssuczkins +:- crvostok - atparys 2:0 7:1 ( 27:5 ) cRUSaders : crvostok 8-0 crnikolay 6-1 ( and one +:- ) crgrady 5-3 crspartak 3-1 crbaumanec 2-0 ( and two +:- ) Attack Team wssuczkins 2-3 ( and three -:+ ) atmaniac 1-7 atparys 1-7 atsnieznyy 1-7 | |
| 2009-11-17 00:45:22 • Piotr Małowiejski (dt_angst) | |
Dark Team - Czech Layback B 25:7 | # 4260 |
| Dark Team – Czech Layback B 25:7
I round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 7:1 Dtangst – Bizur 2:0 Dtdein – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtence – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtpuholek – Czltero 2:0 II round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 5:3 (12:4) Dtangst – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtdein – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtence – Czltero 0:2 Dtpuholek – Bizur 2:0 III round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 6:2 (18:6) Czlkolecko for Bizur Dtangst – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtdein – Czltero 2:0 Dtence – Czlkolecko 2:0 Dtpuholek – Czl3ck 1:1 IV round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 7:1 (25:7) Dtangst – Czltero 2:0 Dtdein – Czlkolecko 2:0 Dtence – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtpuholek – Czlpruda 1:1 Dark Team 25–7 Dtangst 7–1 Dtdein 7–1 Dtpuholek 6–2 Dtence 5–3 Czech Layback 7–25 Czlpruda 4–4 Czltero 2–6 Czl3ck 1–7 Bizur 0–4 Czlkolecko 0–4 Thank you for interesting match and good luck next rounds! Kind regards, Angst | |
| 2009-11-11 19:34:09 • Radek Cmiel (mrzx6rr) | |
RE: corrections | # 4248 |
| Yep, this one pint is my:-D | |
| 2009-11-11 16:02:48 • Pavel Laube (kedlub) | |
RE: corrections | # 4246 |
| Nonsense :-) | |
| 2009-11-11 14:21:23 • Michał Żukowski (zukolepl) | |
corrections | # 4245 |
| third round Midi Rod NG - Superteam_
2 mrzx6rr : st_matandros 0 : 1 1 : 0 1 : 1 fourth round Woodenheads B - Company 2 wh_kedlub : com_rakdar 1 : 0 0:1 1 : 1 | |